Numerology ⇒ Pythagoras / The square of Pythagoras with the interpretation for 23.05.1986 (May 23, 1986)

Character value 1 is a combination of stubbornness and feeble-mindedness. This person is unable to make a choice, a decision they would follow. The only chance for having any life philosophy is to be in opposition. That is what they do in each particular case. The subject matter itself is not important. Pure contradiction as a sign of personal opinion, that is what counts. No reasonable argument will do here, they will never agree. The only way to make this person change their opinion is to lend them yours, make them think the right decision is their own, something they came up with. Only then will they be glad to accept it. If properly done, they may take advantage of it, otherwise just pass the buck to someone else.

This value indicates significant shortage of one’s own energy reserves. This is not a 100% vampire person, but just like someone with no twos, they need a donor, that is why they are equally fussy, always overexcited, and annoying. Meanwhile, a person with one two is capable of objectively fruitful actions. However, these take a form of capital investment with mandatory return with interest. Such return may take the form of approval and public recognition of their deeds. Otherwise, no reason to bother yourself doing anything. This is often a major mistake. Amplifying this quality requires learning how not to waste energy resources. A desire for praise is just a vain pursuit in the words of fortune-tellers.

An extremely rare value indicating a potential genius, a mind in pursuit of pure knowledge capable of accumulating the Universal wisdom. In real world situations, however, this is usually a scientist, a prominent expert, a highest class professional. Application area in this case is defined by other psychomatrix values corresponding to the person’s penchant for this or that activity. Anyway, exceptional skills in exact sciences will play a decisive role here. For a man, this is manna from heaven. For a woman, especially when there is a strong penchant for family life, this value may become a complicating factor. If a man’s name is not Pierre, he is unlikely to get excited about the idea of marrying a Marie Curie.

This kind of person doesn’t have to care too much about their health, as Old Reaper is not yet approaching. However, placing bets on physical conditions when choosing a lifestyle is undesirable. If properly developed, it’s fine, but there is no urgent need to exhaust oneself. It’s just not worth it. So, the best solution is to embrace the situation as is and act accordingly. There are plenty of ways for self-actualization with health being only a secondary factor. After all, it is the XXI century, no one is going to force you to pull coal-filled trolleys nowadays. Nevertheless, health should be taken care of. Otherwise, the body reserves may turn out to be insufficient for the most important things. That would be a pity.

Weak penchant for logical comprehension of reality. This type of person is capable of reasonable behavior at the beginning, but they can hardly keep it up. Far more likely is that a good start will be the only good thing, followed by overestimation of opportunities and frustrated hopes quite common in such cases. High level of learning abilities (3) and good memory may enable this person to develop a well-considered approach to any issue, be it occupation-related or some household problem. However, the development often takes the best years. So it’s better to decide right away if the goal is worth the trouble and avoid constraining yourself about something that is literally against your nature. After all, one can identify their aspiration as early as school years.

Slightly pronounced penchant for manual labor. The ideal option is to become a white collar with some hobby. Meaning, such person has to earn their living working in an office, and manual work is left for leisure. The specific choice should depend on the importance of pragmatic manual labor results for such a person. If fruits don’t matter, they can choose some sport optimal for their health. In case they are not willing to waste muscular energy, some more useful leisure activities should be an option, gardening or applied craft, for instance. Such distribution of aspirations and opportunities allows for having the cake and eating it as well. And most importantly, such people have strictly arranged place and time for everything, so their unpredictable desires won’t be a problem for those around.

Following the same evaluation system, this value signals a certain but not very clear path to success. One has to find it first. Every other way will be full of obstacles and therefore disappointing. It is actually not that hard to make a choice. After all, there are not so many general areas of activity, and it doesn’t take too much time to identify the luckier one. The more specific choice will require more efforts; it will be important not to waste your luck, to save it for each solid and logically justified move. However, when the path is discovered, feel free to rely on the most favorable environment while moving along. That is probably the best chance to gain self-confidence and actualize your innate abilities.

Such people are aware of their duties, but are not really willing to perform them. As a result, the cornerstone turns into a millstone around the neck, and any relationship starts to resemble grave encumbrance instead of pleasure. Unfortunately, this is a rather frequent case. Most are just unable to comprehend that relationships are only pleasant if based upon the desire of giving, not gaining. One who has once ignored their duties towards anyone bears a mark of unreliability, which will once entitle someone else to do the same to them. But that is not the problem. Far more important is that treating duties as an annoying obligation poisons this person’s life and makes them unhappy.

Goldfish memory is a term applicable to this person. What does it mean? Well, they don’t remember things for long. If some information is not vital, it is immediately forgotten. You can’t call such people dumb, but they do look like that. Just think of the criteria to evaluate intelligence. The first thing that comes to mind is a copious academician discussing a specific topic in great detail. Why so copious? Well, it has to do with our memory. Therefore, someone with poor memory can’t possibly make a good impression. However, true intelligence is about being able to evaluate things regardless of stereotypes or patterns. Are there many people capable of that? And if memory is poor, it can be trained, shall such a need arise.