Numerology ⇒ Pythagoras / The square of Pythagoras with the interpretation for 23.01.1981 (January 23, 1981)

This is a leader with strong will and willingness to dominate, without overkills. A 1111 character relationships with others are determined by the terms and conditions of their agreement with themselves. If their desire to achieve something is supported by the appropriate energy potential, they will follow this path, and no obstacle should be sufficient enough to stop them. If the properties of a leader are under control and don’t give way to frustrated ambitions, such person will be content with dominating within their own family and protecting their area of influence. They may once regret they didn’t let their qualities manifest themselves to their fullest. However, this moment may never come.

This energy level is considered indicative of psychic skills. However, this is not a gift for granted, but rather an ability that may manifest itself in an extraordinary situation. So, what kind of situation is extraordinary enough to trigger psychic skills? It is always person-specific. One may need to witness a tsunami, while other only has to prick a finger. In everyday life, such person is much like those with a single two in their psychomatrix, just as much restless and fussy, and even more secluded and withdrawn. They are, however, capable of unexpected and seemingly non-motivated outbursts of emotions, which complicate any relationships with such people even further.

Two threes in one’s psychomatrix indicate an explicit, but not overwhelming interest in technical subjects. This person may find their application in various fields, but they will definitely enjoy manual labor. Meaning, of course, not just trench-digging, but rather something that requires technical skills and knowledge of exact sciences. Something like car maintenance, for instance. At the same time, such people may try to combine their interest in technology with craving for beauty. There are plenty of activities making use of such a combination. For instance, industrial design requires some specific knowledge, but also leaves room for creativity. However, the same applies to the oldest profession.

Definitely not the best value. However, many of those whose names are well-known today had poor health in their childhood. The list includes Alfred the Great, Hans Christian Andersen, Morihei Ueshiba. Poor health, however, didn’t stop the first of them from earning his nickname, the second from becoming the greatest fairy-tale writer of all times, the third from inventing aikido. So, poor health is not a reason to give up. Health can and should be improved using case-specific methodology. You don’t have to become a hero hammerman or sports superstar (this, however, has been the case a few times). It is enough to ensure sustainable health parameters so that asthenia doesn’t hinder you from doing what you love, giving birth to and raising children, feeling happy, after all.

Weak penchant for logical comprehension of reality. This type of person is capable of reasonable behavior at the beginning, but they can hardly keep it up. Far more likely is that a good start will be the only good thing, followed by overestimation of opportunities and frustrated hopes quite common in such cases. High level of learning abilities (3) and good memory may enable this person to develop a well-considered approach to any issue, be it occupation-related or some household problem. However, the development often takes the best years. So it’s better to decide right away if the goal is worth the trouble and avoid constraining yourself about something that is literally against your nature. After all, one can identify their aspiration as early as school years.

No willingness to bust a gut to do anything. If this person happens to work hard, it is only due to a certain objective necessity, when a job should be done, but there is no one else to do it, for instance. Such people are inclined to work with their brain and live on the fruits of intellectual labor. This doesn’t imply, however, that they aren’t capable of any hard manual labor due to poor health. They are, but aren’t willing to. Therefore, the sooner they make use of their intellectual abilities, the more likely they are to avoid troubles inescapably resulting from such self-pushing. Having to perform physical work with no penchant for it, for example, often causes grave or even tragic nervous breakdowns.

Following the same evaluation system, this value signals a certain but not very clear path to success. One has to find it first. Every other way will be full of obstacles and therefore disappointing. It is actually not that hard to make a choice. After all, there are not so many general areas of activity, and it doesn’t take too much time to identify the luckier one. The more specific choice will require more efforts; it will be important not to waste your luck, to save it for each solid and logically justified move. However, when the path is discovered, feel free to rely on the most favorable environment while moving along. That is probably the best chance to gain self-confidence and actualize your innate abilities.

Such people are aware of their duties, but are not really willing to perform them. As a result, the cornerstone turns into a millstone around the neck, and any relationship starts to resemble grave encumbrance instead of pleasure. Unfortunately, this is a rather frequent case. Most are just unable to comprehend that relationships are only pleasant if based upon the desire of giving, not gaining. One who has once ignored their duties towards anyone bears a mark of unreliability, which will once entitle someone else to do the same to them. But that is not the problem. Far more important is that treating duties as an annoying obligation poisons this person’s life and makes them unhappy.

Goldfish memory is a term applicable to this person. What does it mean? Well, they don’t remember things for long. If some information is not vital, it is immediately forgotten. You can’t call such people dumb, but they do look like that. Just think of the criteria to evaluate intelligence. The first thing that comes to mind is a copious academician discussing a specific topic in great detail. Why so copious? Well, it has to do with our memory. Therefore, someone with poor memory can’t possibly make a good impression. However, true intelligence is about being able to evaluate things regardless of stereotypes or patterns. Are there many people capable of that? And if memory is poor, it can be trained, shall such a need arise.