Numerology ⇒ Pythagoras / The square of Pythagoras with the interpretation for 30.03.1973 (March 30, 1973)

Character value 1 is a combination of stubbornness and feeble-mindedness. This person is unable to make a choice, a decision they would follow. The only chance for having any life philosophy is to be in opposition. That is what they do in each particular case. The subject matter itself is not important. Pure contradiction as a sign of personal opinion, that is what counts. No reasonable argument will do here, they will never agree. The only way to make this person change their opinion is to lend them yours, make them think the right decision is their own, something they came up with. Only then will they be glad to accept it. If properly done, they may take advantage of it, otherwise just pass the buck to someone else.

This energy level is considered indicative of psychic skills. However, this is not a gift for granted, but rather an ability that may manifest itself in an extraordinary situation. So, what kind of situation is extraordinary enough to trigger psychic skills? It is always person-specific. One may need to witness a tsunami, while other only has to prick a finger. In everyday life, such person is much like those with a single two in their psychomatrix, just as much restless and fussy, and even more secluded and withdrawn. They are, however, capable of unexpected and seemingly non-motivated outbursts of emotions, which complicate any relationships with such people even further.

Clear, but unstable penchant for exact sciences. Meaning, you have the skills, but there is no persistent interest in something specific, which is the reason why practical results of exploiting such potential may be ambiguous. A very common result is the person’s endless ambivalence, jumping from one activity to another, quickly starting and losing interest. It all ends with either complete disregard of opportunities to learn something, or escapism and soul-searching. In the latter case, assessing one’s success is impossible for there is no one and nothing to compare it with. Another far less frequent result is about combining segmental knowledge and skills, bringing them to a common denominator. Such process gives birth to new subjects and fields of science. The examples are around us. Numerology is a combination of mathematics and psychology.

Definitely not the best value. However, many of those whose names are well-known today had poor health in their childhood. The list includes Alfred the Great, Hans Christian Andersen, Morihei Ueshiba. Poor health, however, didn’t stop the first of them from earning his nickname, the second from becoming the greatest fairy-tale writer of all times, the third from inventing aikido. So, poor health is not a reason to give up. Health can and should be improved using case-specific methodology. You don’t have to become a hero hammerman or sports superstar (this, however, has been the case a few times). It is enough to ensure sustainable health parameters so that asthenia doesn’t hinder you from doing what you love, giving birth to and raising children, feeling happy, after all.

Such people are often dreamers, which sounds quite inoffensive. There is sure nothing wrong about dreams as long as they have to do with the dreamer only. I once was acquainted with a would-have-been architect who suddenly decided to go into astrophysics having no idea of what it is. It took him five years to cover tons of paper in writing (by hand) until he discovered a brochure the twenty pages of which contained plausible evidence of how inadequate his theory was. Well, these were his five years. Wasted. He could have married someone, after all. People of this kind should not get involved in exact sciences. They’d better give preference to humanities where everyone is free to express themselves in the way they want without risking to harm others. However, it is always quite problematic to be in a relationship with someone unable to establish a cause-effect connection. There is only one hope left – sooner or later, life experience will take up the functions of logical thinking that go missing.

Slightly pronounced penchant for manual labor. The ideal option is to become a white collar with some hobby. Meaning, such person has to earn their living working in an office, and manual work is left for leisure. The specific choice should depend on the importance of pragmatic manual labor results for such a person. If fruits don’t matter, they can choose some sport optimal for their health. In case they are not willing to waste muscular energy, some more useful leisure activities should be an option, gardening or applied craft, for instance. Such distribution of aspirations and opportunities allows for having the cake and eating it as well. And most importantly, such people have strictly arranged place and time for everything, so their unpredictable desires won’t be a problem for those around.

Following the same evaluation system, this value signals a certain but not very clear path to success. One has to find it first. Every other way will be full of obstacles and therefore disappointing. It is actually not that hard to make a choice. After all, there are not so many general areas of activity, and it doesn’t take too much time to identify the luckier one. The more specific choice will require more efforts; it will be important not to waste your luck, to save it for each solid and logically justified move. However, when the path is discovered, feel free to rely on the most favorable environment while moving along. That is probably the best chance to gain self-confidence and actualize your innate abilities.

Such people are aware of their duties, but are not really willing to perform them. As a result, the cornerstone turns into a millstone around the neck, and any relationship starts to resemble grave encumbrance instead of pleasure. Unfortunately, this is a rather frequent case. Most are just unable to comprehend that relationships are only pleasant if based upon the desire of giving, not gaining. One who has once ignored their duties towards anyone bears a mark of unreliability, which will once entitle someone else to do the same to them. But that is not the problem. Far more important is that treating duties as an annoying obligation poisons this person’s life and makes them unhappy.

Goldfish memory is a term applicable to this person. What does it mean? Well, they don’t remember things for long. If some information is not vital, it is immediately forgotten. You can’t call such people dumb, but they do look like that. Just think of the criteria to evaluate intelligence. The first thing that comes to mind is a copious academician discussing a specific topic in great detail. Why so copious? Well, it has to do with our memory. Therefore, someone with poor memory can’t possibly make a good impression. However, true intelligence is about being able to evaluate things regardless of stereotypes or patterns. Are there many people capable of that? And if memory is poor, it can be trained, shall such a need arise.