Numerology ⇒ Pythagoras / The square of Pythagoras with the interpretation for 12.01.1930 (January 12, 1930)

An excessively strong and authoritative person who never doubts their rightness and, therefore, the right to act according to their own desires in each and every situation. Pressing them is like triggering an AP-mine. This quality is a huge threat both to its bearer and the people around. For the latter, such willpower manifestations are close to tyranny with even the minimum essential needs of others not being taken into account. For this person, there will always be someone who is stronger, while tyrannical attitude to others means that a vice a versa case is possible and acceptable. If you are mindless of others, why should they not be mindless of you? Such level of willpower may be really helpful while achieving goals of a solo type, where one doesn’t have to subdue others, and personal success is not the result of someone else’s failure. This could be any form of art, for instance.

This value indicates significant shortage of one’s own energy reserves. This is not a 100% vampire person, but just like someone with no twos, they need a donor, that is why they are equally fussy, always overexcited, and annoying. Meanwhile, a person with one two is capable of objectively fruitful actions. However, these take a form of capital investment with mandatory return with interest. Such return may take the form of approval and public recognition of their deeds. Otherwise, no reason to bother yourself doing anything. This is often a major mistake. Amplifying this quality requires learning how not to waste energy resources. A desire for praise is just a vain pursuit in the words of fortune-tellers.

They are not pure humanitarians, nor they digitheads still. They may have very broad interests. Therefore, nothing prevents these people from using the proven and reliable trial and error method to identify true aspirations. Erroneous should be getting blinded by the first success in any field, refusing to try anything else. This person’s skills are very likely to be evenly distributed among several different occupations, but only one of them may become their lifetime project, providing them with a feeling of total satisfaction. It is also very important not to miss the chance, to identify it so as to avoid wasting time on something that is accessible, but not desirable. Searching may take years, but it is worth the while.

Definitely not the best value. However, many of those whose names are well-known today had poor health in their childhood. The list includes Alfred the Great, Hans Christian Andersen, Morihei Ueshiba. Poor health, however, didn’t stop the first of them from earning his nickname, the second from becoming the greatest fairy-tale writer of all times, the third from inventing aikido. So, poor health is not a reason to give up. Health can and should be improved using case-specific methodology. You don’t have to become a hero hammerman or sports superstar (this, however, has been the case a few times). It is enough to ensure sustainable health parameters so that asthenia doesn’t hinder you from doing what you love, giving birth to and raising children, feeling happy, after all.

Weak penchant for logical comprehension of reality. This type of person is capable of reasonable behavior at the beginning, but they can hardly keep it up. Far more likely is that a good start will be the only good thing, followed by overestimation of opportunities and frustrated hopes quite common in such cases. High level of learning abilities (3) and good memory may enable this person to develop a well-considered approach to any issue, be it occupation-related or some household problem. However, the development often takes the best years. So it’s better to decide right away if the goal is worth the trouble and avoid constraining yourself about something that is literally against your nature. After all, one can identify their aspiration as early as school years.

Slightly pronounced penchant for manual labor. The ideal option is to become a white collar with some hobby. Meaning, such person has to earn their living working in an office, and manual work is left for leisure. The specific choice should depend on the importance of pragmatic manual labor results for such a person. If fruits don’t matter, they can choose some sport optimal for their health. In case they are not willing to waste muscular energy, some more useful leisure activities should be an option, gardening or applied craft, for instance. Such distribution of aspirations and opportunities allows for having the cake and eating it as well. And most importantly, such people have strictly arranged place and time for everything, so their unpredictable desires won’t be a problem for those around.

Following the same evaluation system, this value signals a certain but not very clear path to success. One has to find it first. Every other way will be full of obstacles and therefore disappointing. It is actually not that hard to make a choice. After all, there are not so many general areas of activity, and it doesn’t take too much time to identify the luckier one. The more specific choice will require more efforts; it will be important not to waste your luck, to save it for each solid and logically justified move. However, when the path is discovered, feel free to rely on the most favorable environment while moving along. That is probably the best chance to gain self-confidence and actualize your innate abilities.

Such people are aware of their duties, but are not really willing to perform them. As a result, the cornerstone turns into a millstone around the neck, and any relationship starts to resemble grave encumbrance instead of pleasure. Unfortunately, this is a rather frequent case. Most are just unable to comprehend that relationships are only pleasant if based upon the desire of giving, not gaining. One who has once ignored their duties towards anyone bears a mark of unreliability, which will once entitle someone else to do the same to them. But that is not the problem. Far more important is that treating duties as an annoying obligation poisons this person’s life and makes them unhappy.

Goldfish memory is a term applicable to this person. What does it mean? Well, they don’t remember things for long. If some information is not vital, it is immediately forgotten. You can’t call such people dumb, but they do look like that. Just think of the criteria to evaluate intelligence. The first thing that comes to mind is a copious academician discussing a specific topic in great detail. Why so copious? Well, it has to do with our memory. Therefore, someone with poor memory can’t possibly make a good impression. However, true intelligence is about being able to evaluate things regardless of stereotypes or patterns. Are there many people capable of that? And if memory is poor, it can be trained, shall such a need arise.