Numerology ⇒ Pythagoras / The square of Pythagoras with the interpretation for 21.01.1751 (January 21, 1751)

An excessively strong and authoritative person who never doubts their rightness and, therefore, the right to act according to their own desires in each and every situation. Pressing them is like triggering an AP-mine. This quality is a huge threat both to its bearer and the people around. For the latter, such willpower manifestations are close to tyranny with even the minimum essential needs of others not being taken into account. For this person, there will always be someone who is stronger, while tyrannical attitude to others means that a vice a versa case is possible and acceptable. If you are mindless of others, why should they not be mindless of you? Such level of willpower may be really helpful while achieving goals of a solo type, where one doesn’t have to subdue others, and personal success is not the result of someone else’s failure. This could be any form of art, for instance.

This value indicates significant shortage of one’s own energy reserves. This is not a 100% vampire person, but just like someone with no twos, they need a donor, that is why they are equally fussy, always overexcited, and annoying. Meanwhile, a person with one two is capable of objectively fruitful actions. However, these take a form of capital investment with mandatory return with interest. Such return may take the form of approval and public recognition of their deeds. Otherwise, no reason to bother yourself doing anything. This is often a major mistake. Amplifying this quality requires learning how not to waste energy resources. A desire for praise is just a vain pursuit in the words of fortune-tellers.

You are interested in humanities above all. The earlier you realize it and take it into account, the better. Otherwise, you may waste some part of your life studying subjects you have no aspiration for. This mostly happens to boys. Choosing between what is necessary and what is not guided by the this-is-not-what-a-man-should-do principle, parents (especially fathers) trying to foster in their sons those interests they deem appropriate. The same happens when the father has had some success in the technical field and dreams of establishing a professional dynasty. This is bad practice possibly resulting both in wasting time and effort, as well as in deteriorating family relationships due to the complete lack of mutual understanding.

This kind of person doesn’t have to care too much about their health, as Old Reaper is not yet approaching. However, placing bets on physical conditions when choosing a lifestyle is undesirable. If properly developed, it’s fine, but there is no urgent need to exhaust oneself. It’s just not worth it. So, the best solution is to embrace the situation as is and act accordingly. There are plenty of ways for self-actualization with health being only a secondary factor. After all, it is the XXI century, no one is going to force you to pull coal-filled trolleys nowadays. Nevertheless, health should be taken care of. Otherwise, the body reserves may turn out to be insufficient for the most important things. That would be a pity.

A typical empiricist, that is a practitioner and pragmatist. No statement is taken for granted without logical analysis. Paraphrasing one Latin proverb, “There may only be what there is”, for such a man. This value allows for planning actions several steps ahead as the result of each move is easy to calculate. Such people never ask, “How could this have happened?” It is easy and convenient of course to establish both professional and personal relationships with such a person. They may afford dreaming only if such dreams are feasible. Their partners may sometimes feel bored, but the feeling of confidence will always remain.

No willingness to bust a gut to do anything. If this person happens to work hard, it is only due to a certain objective necessity, when a job should be done, but there is no one else to do it, for instance. Such people are inclined to work with their brain and live on the fruits of intellectual labor. This doesn’t imply, however, that they aren’t capable of any hard manual labor due to poor health. They are, but aren’t willing to. Therefore, the sooner they make use of their intellectual abilities, the more likely they are to avoid troubles inescapably resulting from such self-pushing. Having to perform physical work with no penchant for it, for example, often causes grave or even tragic nervous breakdowns.

Following the same evaluation system, this value signals a certain but not very clear path to success. One has to find it first. Every other way will be full of obstacles and therefore disappointing. It is actually not that hard to make a choice. After all, there are not so many general areas of activity, and it doesn’t take too much time to identify the luckier one. The more specific choice will require more efforts; it will be important not to waste your luck, to save it for each solid and logically justified move. However, when the path is discovered, feel free to rely on the most favorable environment while moving along. That is probably the best chance to gain self-confidence and actualize your innate abilities.

Such people are aware of their duties, but are not really willing to perform them. As a result, the cornerstone turns into a millstone around the neck, and any relationship starts to resemble grave encumbrance instead of pleasure. Unfortunately, this is a rather frequent case. Most are just unable to comprehend that relationships are only pleasant if based upon the desire of giving, not gaining. One who has once ignored their duties towards anyone bears a mark of unreliability, which will once entitle someone else to do the same to them. But that is not the problem. Far more important is that treating duties as an annoying obligation poisons this person’s life and makes them unhappy.

Goldfish memory is a term applicable to this person. What does it mean? Well, they don’t remember things for long. If some information is not vital, it is immediately forgotten. You can’t call such people dumb, but they do look like that. Just think of the criteria to evaluate intelligence. The first thing that comes to mind is a copious academician discussing a specific topic in great detail. Why so copious? Well, it has to do with our memory. Therefore, someone with poor memory can’t possibly make a good impression. However, true intelligence is about being able to evaluate things regardless of stereotypes or patterns. Are there many people capable of that? And if memory is poor, it can be trained, shall such a need arise.