Numerology ⇒ Pythagoras / The square of Pythagoras with the interpretation for 05.12.1692 (December 05, 1692)

Three ones as a character value signal a man of strong will and integrity. They are ready to accept any point of view, but only if they deem it appropriate. Otherwise, any pushing will lead to the boomerang effect with counteracting being accordingly powerful. This person, seemingly gentle and flexible, has immense inner strength, which is fundamental to their personality. It is hardly possible to break or bend them. However, you can always trust them and count on them, for once they make a decision, they will never change it, never break their promises, even those unspoken, but hinted at.

This energy level is considered indicative of psychic skills. However, this is not a gift for granted, but rather an ability that may manifest itself in an extraordinary situation. So, what kind of situation is extraordinary enough to trigger psychic skills? It is always person-specific. One may need to witness a tsunami, while other only has to prick a finger. In everyday life, such person is much like those with a single two in their psychomatrix, just as much restless and fussy, and even more secluded and withdrawn. They are, however, capable of unexpected and seemingly non-motivated outbursts of emotions, which complicate any relationships with such people even further.

You are interested in humanities above all. The earlier you realize it and take it into account, the better. Otherwise, you may waste some part of your life studying subjects you have no aspiration for. This mostly happens to boys. Choosing between what is necessary and what is not guided by the this-is-not-what-a-man-should-do principle, parents (especially fathers) trying to foster in their sons those interests they deem appropriate. The same happens when the father has had some success in the technical field and dreams of establishing a professional dynasty. This is bad practice possibly resulting both in wasting time and effort, as well as in deteriorating family relationships due to the complete lack of mutual understanding.

Definitely not the best value. However, many of those whose names are well-known today had poor health in their childhood. The list includes Alfred the Great, Hans Christian Andersen, Morihei Ueshiba. Poor health, however, didn’t stop the first of them from earning his nickname, the second from becoming the greatest fairy-tale writer of all times, the third from inventing aikido. So, poor health is not a reason to give up. Health can and should be improved using case-specific methodology. You don’t have to become a hero hammerman or sports superstar (this, however, has been the case a few times). It is enough to ensure sustainable health parameters so that asthenia doesn’t hinder you from doing what you love, giving birth to and raising children, feeling happy, after all.

Weak penchant for logical comprehension of reality. This type of person is capable of reasonable behavior at the beginning, but they can hardly keep it up. Far more likely is that a good start will be the only good thing, followed by overestimation of opportunities and frustrated hopes quite common in such cases. High level of learning abilities (3) and good memory may enable this person to develop a well-considered approach to any issue, be it occupation-related or some household problem. However, the development often takes the best years. So it’s better to decide right away if the goal is worth the trouble and avoid constraining yourself about something that is literally against your nature. After all, one can identify their aspiration as early as school years.

Quality overload resulting in one’s inability to control applications of their physical capacities. The overabundance of energy may lead to actions with barely predictable consequences. Such people are said to host devils, and St. John the Evangelist referred to 666 as the Number of the Beast. However, mysticism aside and real world in the spotlight, this man is unstoppable. And it doesn’t matter what they do and where they go. As a result, these people are often soloists, singletons. Niccolo Paganini type. A man of moods, whose moods, however, are impossible for an outsider to comprehend or figure out. You can only build up relationships with such a person if you don’t try to push them or intrude into their private world. In other words, don’t tease devils.

Following the same evaluation system, this value signals a certain but not very clear path to success. One has to find it first. Every other way will be full of obstacles and therefore disappointing. It is actually not that hard to make a choice. After all, there are not so many general areas of activity, and it doesn’t take too much time to identify the luckier one. The more specific choice will require more efforts; it will be important not to waste your luck, to save it for each solid and logically justified move. However, when the path is discovered, feel free to rely on the most favorable environment while moving along. That is probably the best chance to gain self-confidence and actualize your innate abilities.

Such people are aware of their duties, but are not really willing to perform them. As a result, the cornerstone turns into a millstone around the neck, and any relationship starts to resemble grave encumbrance instead of pleasure. Unfortunately, this is a rather frequent case. Most are just unable to comprehend that relationships are only pleasant if based upon the desire of giving, not gaining. One who has once ignored their duties towards anyone bears a mark of unreliability, which will once entitle someone else to do the same to them. But that is not the problem. Far more important is that treating duties as an annoying obligation poisons this person’s life and makes them unhappy.

Goldfish memory is a term applicable to this person. What does it mean? Well, they don’t remember things for long. If some information is not vital, it is immediately forgotten. You can’t call such people dumb, but they do look like that. Just think of the criteria to evaluate intelligence. The first thing that comes to mind is a copious academician discussing a specific topic in great detail. Why so copious? Well, it has to do with our memory. Therefore, someone with poor memory can’t possibly make a good impression. However, true intelligence is about being able to evaluate things regardless of stereotypes or patterns. Are there many people capable of that? And if memory is poor, it can be trained, shall such a need arise.