Numerology ⇒ Pythagoras / The square of Pythagoras with the interpretation for 21.04.1671 (April 21, 1671)

This is a leader with strong will and willingness to dominate, without overkills. A 1111 character relationships with others are determined by the terms and conditions of their agreement with themselves. If their desire to achieve something is supported by the appropriate energy potential, they will follow this path, and no obstacle should be sufficient enough to stop them. If the properties of a leader are under control and don’t give way to frustrated ambitions, such person will be content with dominating within their own family and protecting their area of influence. They may once regret they didn’t let their qualities manifest themselves to their fullest. However, this moment may never come.

This energy level is considered indicative of psychic skills. However, this is not a gift for granted, but rather an ability that may manifest itself in an extraordinary situation. So, what kind of situation is extraordinary enough to trigger psychic skills? It is always person-specific. One may need to witness a tsunami, while other only has to prick a finger. In everyday life, such person is much like those with a single two in their psychomatrix, just as much restless and fussy, and even more secluded and withdrawn. They are, however, capable of unexpected and seemingly non-motivated outbursts of emotions, which complicate any relationships with such people even further.

You are interested in humanities above all. The earlier you realize it and take it into account, the better. Otherwise, you may waste some part of your life studying subjects you have no aspiration for. This mostly happens to boys. Choosing between what is necessary and what is not guided by the this-is-not-what-a-man-should-do principle, parents (especially fathers) trying to foster in their sons those interests they deem appropriate. The same happens when the father has had some success in the technical field and dreams of establishing a professional dynasty. This is bad practice possibly resulting both in wasting time and effort, as well as in deteriorating family relationships due to the complete lack of mutual understanding.

Excellent physical condition. If this person’s goal solely requires good health (i.e. sports or hard physical labor), the result is guaranteed. The most important about this value is self-confidence which allows you to live without looking back, to take the most extraordinary projects, to implement the craziest of ideas. What’s inside determines what exactly it will be. Ordinary men may try to conquer Mount Everest, or travel to a desert in search of treasures. A more substantial person will find a weaker one in need of support, will feed and protect them. They may as well take their weaker companion to a mount peak and let them feel strong, too.

Such people are often dreamers, which sounds quite inoffensive. There is sure nothing wrong about dreams as long as they have to do with the dreamer only. I once was acquainted with a would-have-been architect who suddenly decided to go into astrophysics having no idea of what it is. It took him five years to cover tons of paper in writing (by hand) until he discovered a brochure the twenty pages of which contained plausible evidence of how inadequate his theory was. Well, these were his five years. Wasted. He could have married someone, after all. People of this kind should not get involved in exact sciences. They’d better give preference to humanities where everyone is free to express themselves in the way they want without risking to harm others. However, it is always quite problematic to be in a relationship with someone unable to establish a cause-effect connection. There is only one hope left – sooner or later, life experience will take up the functions of logical thinking that go missing.

Slightly pronounced penchant for manual labor. The ideal option is to become a white collar with some hobby. Meaning, such person has to earn their living working in an office, and manual work is left for leisure. The specific choice should depend on the importance of pragmatic manual labor results for such a person. If fruits don’t matter, they can choose some sport optimal for their health. In case they are not willing to waste muscular energy, some more useful leisure activities should be an option, gardening or applied craft, for instance. Such distribution of aspirations and opportunities allows for having the cake and eating it as well. And most importantly, such people have strictly arranged place and time for everything, so their unpredictable desires won’t be a problem for those around.

Following the same evaluation system, this value signals a certain but not very clear path to success. One has to find it first. Every other way will be full of obstacles and therefore disappointing. It is actually not that hard to make a choice. After all, there are not so many general areas of activity, and it doesn’t take too much time to identify the luckier one. The more specific choice will require more efforts; it will be important not to waste your luck, to save it for each solid and logically justified move. However, when the path is discovered, feel free to rely on the most favorable environment while moving along. That is probably the best chance to gain self-confidence and actualize your innate abilities.

Such people are aware of their duties, but are not really willing to perform them. As a result, the cornerstone turns into a millstone around the neck, and any relationship starts to resemble grave encumbrance instead of pleasure. Unfortunately, this is a rather frequent case. Most are just unable to comprehend that relationships are only pleasant if based upon the desire of giving, not gaining. One who has once ignored their duties towards anyone bears a mark of unreliability, which will once entitle someone else to do the same to them. But that is not the problem. Far more important is that treating duties as an annoying obligation poisons this person’s life and makes them unhappy.

Goldfish memory is a term applicable to this person. What does it mean? Well, they don’t remember things for long. If some information is not vital, it is immediately forgotten. You can’t call such people dumb, but they do look like that. Just think of the criteria to evaluate intelligence. The first thing that comes to mind is a copious academician discussing a specific topic in great detail. Why so copious? Well, it has to do with our memory. Therefore, someone with poor memory can’t possibly make a good impression. However, true intelligence is about being able to evaluate things regardless of stereotypes or patterns. Are there many people capable of that? And if memory is poor, it can be trained, shall such a need arise.