Numerology ⇒ Pythagoras / The square of Pythagoras with the interpretation for 12.01.1726 (January 12, 1726)

This is a leader with strong will and willingness to dominate, without overkills. A 1111 character relationships with others are determined by the terms and conditions of their agreement with themselves. If their desire to achieve something is supported by the appropriate energy potential, they will follow this path, and no obstacle should be sufficient enough to stop them. If the properties of a leader are under control and don’t give way to frustrated ambitions, such person will be content with dominating within their own family and protecting their area of influence. They may once regret they didn’t let their qualities manifest themselves to their fullest. However, this moment may never come.

Excessive energy value. This person always needs to blow off steam, requiring someone or something to transfer excessive energy to. Life partner with an acceptor’s parameters, or some energy-consuming activity, both will do. If the activity isn’t purely physical, then it may be sports or science, say, geology. If these preventive measures are ignored, the excessive energy may lead to irritability and irascibility at best. In the worst case, we get a volcanic eruption, and energy concedes to laziness, apathy, and feeble-mindedness.

You are interested in humanities above all. The earlier you realize it and take it into account, the better. Otherwise, you may waste some part of your life studying subjects you have no aspiration for. This mostly happens to boys. Choosing between what is necessary and what is not guided by the this-is-not-what-a-man-should-do principle, parents (especially fathers) trying to foster in their sons those interests they deem appropriate. The same happens when the father has had some success in the technical field and dreams of establishing a professional dynasty. This is bad practice possibly resulting both in wasting time and effort, as well as in deteriorating family relationships due to the complete lack of mutual understanding.

Definitely not the best value. However, many of those whose names are well-known today had poor health in their childhood. The list includes Alfred the Great, Hans Christian Andersen, Morihei Ueshiba. Poor health, however, didn’t stop the first of them from earning his nickname, the second from becoming the greatest fairy-tale writer of all times, the third from inventing aikido. So, poor health is not a reason to give up. Health can and should be improved using case-specific methodology. You don’t have to become a hero hammerman or sports superstar (this, however, has been the case a few times). It is enough to ensure sustainable health parameters so that asthenia doesn’t hinder you from doing what you love, giving birth to and raising children, feeling happy, after all.

Such people are often dreamers, which sounds quite inoffensive. There is sure nothing wrong about dreams as long as they have to do with the dreamer only. I once was acquainted with a would-have-been architect who suddenly decided to go into astrophysics having no idea of what it is. It took him five years to cover tons of paper in writing (by hand) until he discovered a brochure the twenty pages of which contained plausible evidence of how inadequate his theory was. Well, these were his five years. Wasted. He could have married someone, after all. People of this kind should not get involved in exact sciences. They’d better give preference to humanities where everyone is free to express themselves in the way they want without risking to harm others. However, it is always quite problematic to be in a relationship with someone unable to establish a cause-effect connection. There is only one hope left – sooner or later, life experience will take up the functions of logical thinking that go missing.

Slightly pronounced penchant for manual labor. The ideal option is to become a white collar with some hobby. Meaning, such person has to earn their living working in an office, and manual work is left for leisure. The specific choice should depend on the importance of pragmatic manual labor results for such a person. If fruits don’t matter, they can choose some sport optimal for their health. In case they are not willing to waste muscular energy, some more useful leisure activities should be an option, gardening or applied craft, for instance. Such distribution of aspirations and opportunities allows for having the cake and eating it as well. And most importantly, such people have strictly arranged place and time for everything, so their unpredictable desires won’t be a problem for those around.

Following the same evaluation system, this value signals a certain but not very clear path to success. One has to find it first. Every other way will be full of obstacles and therefore disappointing. It is actually not that hard to make a choice. After all, there are not so many general areas of activity, and it doesn’t take too much time to identify the luckier one. The more specific choice will require more efforts; it will be important not to waste your luck, to save it for each solid and logically justified move. However, when the path is discovered, feel free to rely on the most favorable environment while moving along. That is probably the best chance to gain self-confidence and actualize your innate abilities.

Such people are aware of their duties, but are not really willing to perform them. As a result, the cornerstone turns into a millstone around the neck, and any relationship starts to resemble grave encumbrance instead of pleasure. Unfortunately, this is a rather frequent case. Most are just unable to comprehend that relationships are only pleasant if based upon the desire of giving, not gaining. One who has once ignored their duties towards anyone bears a mark of unreliability, which will once entitle someone else to do the same to them. But that is not the problem. Far more important is that treating duties as an annoying obligation poisons this person’s life and makes them unhappy.

Goldfish memory is a term applicable to this person. What does it mean? Well, they don’t remember things for long. If some information is not vital, it is immediately forgotten. You can’t call such people dumb, but they do look like that. Just think of the criteria to evaluate intelligence. The first thing that comes to mind is a copious academician discussing a specific topic in great detail. Why so copious? Well, it has to do with our memory. Therefore, someone with poor memory can’t possibly make a good impression. However, true intelligence is about being able to evaluate things regardless of stereotypes or patterns. Are there many people capable of that? And if memory is poor, it can be trained, shall such a need arise.